Is Flea Bailey Available?

My dachshunds, Laverne and Shirley, actually brought me the paper the other day.

“Read it!  Read it out loud!” they barked, their little tails wagging in anticipation.

“Why the sudden interest in current events?” I asked my dachshunds.  Then I spotted the article on animal rights in Switzerland.

Voters in Switzerland would be going to the polls the next day, the article said, to vote on a referendum that would compel every town in the country to provide legal representation for animals.

Switzerland, more commonly known for its cheese and tight-lipped bankers, is also the most pro-animal-rights nation on the planet.  For example, prospective dog owners must take a four-hour course before being allowed to purchase a pet.  By contrast, new parents in our country don’t get that much instruction before leaving the hospital with their infant.

In addition, “social” Swiss animals – birds, pigs, fish, and yaks, to name a few – cannot be purchased alone.  They must be provided a companion.  Every a sole needs a soulmate, I guess.  And get this:  sick fish cannot just be flushed down the toilet.  Swiss law dictates they be quickly bashed in the head or placed in a mixture of water and clove oil dissolved in alcohol.

Bella, our crazy Bengal kitty cat, piped up:  “Send me to Switzerland.  I’d love to get away from these stupid dogs, and I could make a nice living taking care of all the sick fish.”

“Here’s something you would like, Bella,” I said to the kitty, “In Switzerland, it is illegal to deprive a pussy  of human contact for more than 24 hours.”

“Whatever.”  Bella jumped on my head and dug her claws in.  “That law is written to benefit humans, not cats.”

If the measure passed, the article went on to say, animals in Switzerland would be guaranteed the right to an attorney.  And if they could not afford an attorney, one would be provided at the expense of the government.

“The only animal I know that can afford an attorney is Trouble, the Maltese who inherited $12 million when Leona Helmsley died.   And I’ll bet that dog has a rich lawyer,” I said.

Laverne and Shirley ignored my snide remarks and howled in joyous support of the referendum.

“What would you two possibly need a lawyer for?” I asked.

The first complaint filed by their attorney, they explained, would be for my failure to provide proper nourishment.

“Your bowls are never empty!  How can you say I don’t feed you?”

The key phrase, apparently, is “ proper nourishment.”  According to Laverne and Shirley, dachshunds require fried eggs at least every other day to maintain the shine in their coats.  Dry kibble is the equivalent of feeding my kids Cocoa Puffs for every meal.

“Okay.  I’ll try to do better,” I promised.  “Is that all?”

They were just getting started.  The shock collars had to go.  Air conditioning in the summer would be a new requirement.  They needed crushed ice, not cubes, in their water dish on days when the high would be over 80 degrees.  But their biggest beef?  Recently, our vet recommended that I purchase health insurance for my dogs, citing a dachshund’s propensity for back problems and the age of my dogs.  Laverne and Shirley are pissed at my refusal to purchase medical and dental insurance.   They’re scared I’ll just put them down and buy a $400 purebred replacement the next day.

I decided to change the subject and went back to the Wall Street Journal.  The biggest proponent of the Swiss referendum, according to the article, is a 51-year-old Swiss attorney named Antoine Goetschel, who is the animal rights public defender in Zurich.  In February, he took an amateur angler to court for abusing a 22-pound pike.   The fisherman had to fight the fish for ten minutes before reeling it in, and that, according to Goetschel, constituted prolonged fish agony that could be considered cruel.

“I could’ve popped that pike in two minutes,” the 7-pound Bella boasted.

I continued reading.  “Goetschel is a vegetarian who has no pets and avoids taking medication because of his opposition to research on lab animals. He became interested in animal rights at the age of 23, when an accident left him unable to speak for 10 days, helping him understand the plight of animals who can’t express themselves.”

“I have no use for vegetarians,” Bella sniffed.

“A lawyer who can’t talk is kind of appealing,” I pointed out.

“We need someone like him!”  Laverne and Shirley yapped in unison.  “A voice insisting on equal rights for all, starting with mandatory health insurance.”

Wait a minute.  Lawyers, government, and mandatory health insurance.  Where have I heard that before?

Translate this post